Radical-safest TLDs in 2007

[rysiek@hackerspace.pl (rysiek)]

Dnia Å?roda, 1 października 2014 17:54:26 Douglas Lucas pisze:
> On 10/01/2014 01:57 PM, rysiek wrote:
> > Dnia poniedziaÅ?ek, 29 wrzeÅ?nia 2014 09:08:48 Douglas Lucas pisze:
> >> I have a historical question. In 2007, anywhere from January to
> >> September, what TLDs were regarded as the most pirate-friendly or
> >> journalism-friendly or safest from takedowns of whatever stripe, e.g.
> >> the sort of DHS DMCA takedowns we have now, etc.?
> > 
> > Might I enquire what could possibly the reason to ask such a question?
> 
> I am writing a short story. There is a scene set in 2007, roughly
> October. Two characters disagree on what TLD to get to provide material
> to others. One wants a .com to sell the stuff. The other wants the most
> non-capitalist, pro-freedom TLD possible. The difference characterizes
> the two individuals.

Cool! Thanks, would love to read your story! :)

But maybe, as garpgarp pointed out already, the more freedom-loving individual 
could remark on how any domain is a liability and they should at least have an 
alternative in the form of an .onion address. Just a thought.

-- 
Pozdr
rysiek
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 411 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20141002/1d7a4930/attachment.sig>