[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Radical-safest TLDs in 2007

To: [email protected]
Subject: Radical-safest TLDs in 2007
From: [email protected] (rysiek)
Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 20:57:35 +0200
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>

Dnia poniedziaÅ?ek, 29 wrzeÅ?nia 2014 09:08:48 Douglas Lucas pisze:
> I have a historical question. In 2007, anywhere from January to
> September, what TLDs were regarded as the most pirate-friendly or
> journalism-friendly or safest from takedowns of whatever stripe, e.g.
> the sort of DHS DMCA takedowns we have now, etc.?

Might I enquire what could possibly the reason to ask such a question?

-- 
Pozdr
rysiek
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 411 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20141001/18b85084/attachment.sig>

Follow-Ups:
- Radical-safest TLDs in 2007
  - From: [email protected] (Douglas Lucas)

Prev by Date: How worse is the shellshock bash bug than Heartbleed?
Next by Date: Email encryption for the wider public
Previous by thread: How worse is the shellshock bash bug than Heartbleed?
Next by thread: Radical-safest TLDs in 2007
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread