[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[cryptography] coderman's keys
- To: cpunks <[email protected]>
- Subject: [cryptography] coderman's keys
- From: [email protected] (Bill St. Clair)
- Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 10:13:37 -0400
- In-reply-to: <CAJVRA1RMKhVDgr3mKTTLK7jnw4vH2a5Zeo06UgCkJ=5R3EK1aw@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAJVRA1S+H6teot68LOFhjZKO6H+H0RvDgxcwKfu-Je8oOUcF-g@mail.gmail.com> <CAJVRA1QdMDQqs4=Z+OyFRzSEteCHh6D2R344T2BBqdr8=bsKbw@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAJVRA1S9zo4Yx3Z5Fqewv0uQdHVfg3Tkj=YBcASgzQs0puoktQ@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAJVRA1RMKhVDgr3mKTTLK7jnw4vH2a5Zeo06UgCkJ=5R3EK1aw@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 12:54 AM, coderman <[email protected]> wrote:
> regarding what's difficult about this key: it maps to an email address
> that does not exist. most users of PGP don't know how to encrypt to a
> key that isn't in the key metadata itself. if you're unable to
> encrypt to a specific key, your OPSEC capabilities are insufficient to
> use this technology. </$0.02>
The problem is encrypting a message to the key, not sending via some
little-known Tor hidden mail transport. At least that's MY interpretation
of the paragraph above.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20131101/75d34a17/attachment.html>