[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
coderman's keys
- To: cpunks <[email protected]>, Cypherpunks list <[email protected]>, Full Disclosure <[email protected]>, Discussion of cryptography and related <[email protected]>
- Subject: coderman's keys
- From: [email protected] (coderman)
- Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 21:11:46 -0700
- In-reply-to: <CAJVRA1S+H6teot68LOFhjZKO6H+H0RvDgxcwKfu-Je8oOUcF-g@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAJVRA1S+H6teot68LOFhjZKO6H+H0RvDgxcwKfu-Je8oOUcF-g@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 7:55 PM, coderman <[email protected]> wrote:
> my contempt for email is well known and reinforced by choice of provider.
>
> there are myriad rebuttals to email as private channel, of which i
> agree fully. however, if you pass muster, i can be reached via secure
> email. yes your default client will balk. this is a feature not a
> bug... "you must be this high to ride..."
still no successful encrypted responses. do i have to sweeten this pot?
let's try an experiment: one bitcoin (~200$USD) to whoever
successfully encrypts a message to my key.
... ready, set, go!