[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Cryptography] Size of the PGP userbase?
- To: [email protected]
- Subject: [Cryptography] Size of the PGP userbase?
- From: [email protected] (James A. Donald)
- Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 19:23:18 +1000
- In-reply-to: <CAD2Ti29Rz8SEXZjvjTY17QSc0MC1wm++PRFtrCBJJvbV9C=qtA@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAMm+LwgfU4m5uGtwX2c8vJfow4DArY7-qmG7-Zm=c+3dQgVEqg@mail.gmail.com> <CAGHP0pLgLAYiwH0W+tPWAjOHyDhm2a4akbQecCggi39tq8K1Xg@mail.gmail.com> <CAMm+LwhuCy7fgSck8puAQkC7EjZM2ipJKYXoTuCD=+_Rys3Y8Q@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAMm+LwhXe2pxzhxW9QwMxgbrP+REfZbGyvfE2jVHKDQ-JoupaA@mail.gmail.com> <CAD2Ti2-N4+faRKhyAXY4cDyJcROQFizFvgnX2u=mprBEHiZzrg@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAD2Ti29Rz8SEXZjvjTY17QSc0MC1wm++PRFtrCBJJvbV9C=qtA@mail.gmail.com>
On 2013-12-16 17:42, grarpamp wrote:
>> So if you are communicating with one of these new fangled email addresses,
>> you have to have the software that encrypts, and your message is secure -
>> because you are not using the old email protocol, though there may something
>> on your computer that pretends to use old email protocol for the benefit of
>> your client.
>
> I read most of your posts here. But is this a question? A statement?
> Please break into parts and rephrase.
It is my understanding of the proposed replacement for email. Magic
email addresses that in fact correspond to an identifier of a public
key, for example the hash of a rule that identifies the public key, and
which result in your message not in fact being passed along by email
protocols.