[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ale] SSH tunnel vs VPN
- Subject: [ale] SSH tunnel vs VPN
- From: agcarver+ale at acarver.net (Alex Carver)
- Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2015 07:59:46 -0800
- In-reply-to: <CAEo=5PyUwR5X5MzkX9PyJaN=EyKzSJTzOgBVm6x45Rf+SY1V_g@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <[email protected]> <CAEo=5PyUwR5X5MzkX9PyJaN=EyKzSJTzOgBVm6x45Rf+SY1V_g@mail.gmail.com>
It does happen to be more than one machine but I've done things like
setup bookmarks and such to reach them via their individual SSH tunnels.
Maybe it's worth a test run if I fire up an old machine and see what
happens.
On 2015-11-06 07:54, Jim Kinney wrote:
> If I only need to connect back to one machine, ssh is fine. If it's more
> than one, a VPN is easier to use.
> On Nov 6, 2015 7:42 AM, "Alex Carver" <agcarver+ale at acarver.net> wrote:
>
>> I'm once again mildly pondering a VPN for home use but I wonder if it's
>> worth the effort over just having SSH with tunnels.
>>
>> The main purpose for either one is to let me get back to my home network
>> from my phone so I can do things like view security cameras, check/send
>> email, and some other minor things.
>>
>> As far as I can tell from the documents, I only need to open a UDP port
>> inbound on the firewall to establish the connection because the server
>> should then set up an outbound connection back to the client (solving
>> the NAT traversal and stateful firewall issues, please correct me if I'm
>> wrong on this).
>>
>> Is it actually worth the setup or should I just stick with SSH? The
>> current setup is an Android phone with ConnectBot and a bunch of
>> tunnels. If I were to go VPN I would get a new machine (likely a SBC
>> like a RasPi) to be the server, the firewall is still a separate device.