[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ale] SSH tunnel vs VPN
- Subject: [ale] SSH tunnel vs VPN
- From: agcarver+ale at acarver.net (Alex Carver)
- Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2015 07:58:06 -0800
- In-reply-to: <CABmokzAT48Ez3yO1sZZdGk+A1FV95WS_LO=Y6_BZ7cpqS7dOzA@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <[email protected]> <CABmokzAT48Ez3yO1sZZdGk+A1FV95WS_LO=Y6_BZ7cpqS7dOzA@mail.gmail.com>
What built-in VPN?
On 2015-11-06 07:44, dev null zero two wrote:
> why not both (other than it doesn't work _that_ great)?! ssh has had a
> built-in vpn for awhile now.
>
> https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/VPN_over_SSH
>
> On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Alex Carver <agcarver+ale at acarver.net>
> wrote:
>
>> I'm once again mildly pondering a VPN for home use but I wonder if it's
>> worth the effort over just having SSH with tunnels.
>>
>> The main purpose for either one is to let me get back to my home network
>> from my phone so I can do things like view security cameras, check/send
>> email, and some other minor things.
>>
>> As far as I can tell from the documents, I only need to open a UDP port
>> inbound on the firewall to establish the connection because the server
>> should then set up an outbound connection back to the client (solving
>> the NAT traversal and stateful firewall issues, please correct me if I'm
>> wrong on this).
>>
>> Is it actually worth the setup or should I just stick with SSH? The
>> current setup is an Android phone with ConnectBot and a bunch of
>> tunnels. If I were to go VPN I would get a new machine (likely a SBC
>> like a RasPi) to be the server, the firewall is still a separate device.