[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[ale] Still using plain FTP? Why?

Subject: [ale] Still using plain FTP? Why?
From: rajaw at c64.us (Raj Wurttemberg)
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 11:00:31 -0500
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

Ahh.. yeah, I should have mentioned that I have the destination as an NFS
mount, so I am not actually SSH'ing to the destination :)

Kind regards,
/Raj


> -----Original Message-----
> From: ale-bounces at ale.org [mailto:ale-bounces at ale.org] On Behalf Of JD
> rsync uses ssh to do network transfers by default (for the last 8 yrs at
least),
> so you might be encrypting without meaning to.
> 
> rsync manpage:
> "Typically, rsync is configured to use ssh by  default, but you may prefer
to
> use rsh on a local network."

Follow-Ups:
- [ale] Still using plain FTP? Why?
  - From: jdp at algoloma.com (JD)

References:
- [ale] Still using plain FTP? Why?
  - From: jdp at algoloma.com (JD)
- [ale] Still using plain FTP? Why?
  - From: mhw at WittsEnd.com (Michael H. Warfield)
- [ale] Still using plain FTP? Why?
  - From: mike at trausch.us (Michael B. Trausch)
- [ale] Still using plain FTP? Why?
  - From: rajaw at c64.us (Raj Wurttemberg)
- [ale] Still using plain FTP? Why?
  - From: jdp at algoloma.com (JD)

Prev by Date: [ale] Still using plain FTP? Why?
Next by Date: [ale] rsync without ssh quick tutorial
Previous by thread: [ale] Still using plain FTP? Why?
Next by thread: [ale] Still using plain FTP? Why?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread