[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[ale] Still using plain FTP? Why?

Subject: [ale] Still using plain FTP? Why?
From: jdp at algoloma.com (JD)
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 09:22:38 -0500

For folks using plain FTP still, I'd like to know why?

We all know it isn't secure and should have been removed from offers in the
1990s (along with telnet).

So, if you are still using plain FTP, why?

Follow-Ups:
- [ale] Still using plain FTP? Why?
  - From: ale_nospam at fayettedigital.com (Jim Lynch)
- [ale] Still using plain FTP? Why?
  - From: rajaw at c64.us (Raj Wurttemberg)
- [ale] Still using plain FTP? Why?
  - From: jkinney at jimkinney.us (Jim Kinney)
- [ale] Still using plain FTP? Why?
  - From: mhw at WittsEnd.com (Michael H. Warfield)
- [ale] Still using plain FTP? Why?
  - From: mike at trausch.us (Michael Trausch)
- [ale] Still using plain FTP? Why?
  - From: millia at panix.com (David Millians)

Prev by Date: [ale] [OT] for those wanting a One+ phone
Next by Date: [ale] Still using plain FTP? Why?
Previous by thread: [ale] [OT] for those wanting a One+ phone
Next by thread: [ale] Still using plain FTP? Why?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread