[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ale] [OT] AT&T/UVerse going to carrier grade NAT?
- Subject: [ale] [OT] AT&T/UVerse going to carrier grade NAT?
- From: stephen at averagesecurityguy.info (Stephen Haywood)
- Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2012 21:37:11 -0400
- In-reply-to: <CALKwpExLSzpNBAc3-ntJFdAGqu8K+PfezjTokmR=CGiR9aF-Lw@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAKtB=OAGG7gdr2Yxs0TxCxchtE3gf6LvYUBqYdJr1BNkBiGynA@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAKtB=OA6NANEjuZe9i5CuDPN6Ygcy9w4bP18hqsn9NGGJJFS5g@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAAt=rgCaafT9RFLv2SeA5c2tQ7QaUDfS1+3q95Co061UC-QybQ@mail.gmail.com> <CALKwpExLSzpNBAc3-ntJFdAGqu8K+PfezjTokmR=CGiR9aF-Lw@mail.gmail.com>
You can do a /30, which would mean the customer gets one IP.
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Brian Mathis
<brian.mathis+ale at betteradmin.com> wrote:
> The smallest feasible subnet you can allocate to a customer is a /29
> (255.255.255.248) which gives you 6 usable IPs, and 1 of those needs
> to be used for the gateway, leaving you with 5. ?You can't hand out 1
> IP at a time.
>
> ? Brian Mathis
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 9:13 PM, James Sumners <james.sumners at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I wonder why they're running out of IPs...
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 2:37 PM, Geoffrey Myers
>> <lists at serioustechnology.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I currently pay $15 for 5 statics. ?I only wanted one, but that's they
>>> way the sell them. ?This is uverse.
>> --
>> James Sumners
>> http://james.roomfullofmirrors.com/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
> See JOBS, ANNOUNCE and SCHOOLS lists at
> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo
--
Stephen Haywood
Information Security Consultant
CISSP, GPEN, OSCP
T: @averagesecguy
W: averagesecurityguy.info