[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ale] [OT] AT&T/UVerse going to carrier grade NAT?
- Subject: [ale] [OT] AT&T/UVerse going to carrier grade NAT?
- From: brian.mathis+ale at betteradmin.com (Brian Mathis)
- Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2012 23:42:42 +0200
- In-reply-to: <CAAt=rgCaafT9RFLv2SeA5c2tQ7QaUDfS1+3q95Co061UC-QybQ@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAKtB=OAGG7gdr2Yxs0TxCxchtE3gf6LvYUBqYdJr1BNkBiGynA@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAKtB=OA6NANEjuZe9i5CuDPN6Ygcy9w4bP18hqsn9NGGJJFS5g@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAAt=rgCaafT9RFLv2SeA5c2tQ7QaUDfS1+3q95Co061UC-QybQ@mail.gmail.com>
The smallest feasible subnet you can allocate to a customer is a /29
(255.255.255.248) which gives you 6 usable IPs, and 1 of those needs
to be used for the gateway, leaving you with 5. You can't hand out 1
IP at a time.
? Brian Mathis
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 9:13 PM, James Sumners <james.sumners at gmail.com> wrote:
> I wonder why they're running out of IPs...
>
> On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 2:37 PM, Geoffrey Myers
> <lists at serioustechnology.com> wrote:
>>
>> I currently pay $15 for 5 statics. ?I only wanted one, but that's they
>> way the sell them. ?This is uverse.
> --
> James Sumners
> http://james.roomfullofmirrors.com/