[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ale] Time to stir the pot
- Subject: [ale] Time to stir the pot
- From: vernard at venger.net (Vernard Martin)
- Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2012 19:54:57 -0500
- In-reply-to: <1325701451.1814.22.camel@ubuntumate>
- References: <CAEo=5PzC6P9RRCXoMoiT+355LZ1eVtPw+VJHY-aRpDxdf2U-zw@mail.gmail.com> <1325608306.1804.46.camel@ubuntumate> <CAOP+5Y9yvte4ZAnNNH38pwZZ-zrN6BrCUEq-XZe9jSpszXbdDQ@mail.gmail.com> <CACv9p5rprBG=fYQFBOZD3Hd-XKavUh7YH25Hh2t6BvHuHT20UA@mail.gmail.com> <1325701451.1814.22.camel@ubuntumate>
On 01/04/2012 01:24 PM, Rich Faulkner wrote:
> If memory serves, Richard Stallman started the GNU Project out of his
> days at MIT and UNIX. He never (until recently?) had a kernel for his
> work though. GNU Project provided bits and pieces of the pie but
> never the kernel. This is where Linus and his tweaking of Minix fell
> into place but well after RMS got his work going. The relationship of
> GNU/Linux is a marriage more than a following of coat tails that I'm
> aware of...
>
<insert standard disclaimer confirming these are the rantings of an
opinionated geek>
The problem with GNU/Linux is that it assumes that there is nothing else
of real import in the system that isn't GNU or the Linux kernel. And
that is more ludicrous than anything else.
There are PLENTY of non-GNU software present in the system and they
aren't clamoring to get their names plastered onto the distro type.
I'm not saying that he doesn't have a point. But I'm saying that the way
he chooses to make his point leads me (and some others) to classify him
as a pedantic lunatic rather than someone seriously trying to enact change.
Notice that Stallman keeps harping on "GNU" and not "FOSS".
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.ale.org/pipermail/ale/attachments/20120104/4b483c0e/attachment-0001.html