[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ale] I can see why RHEL people don't use Emacs...
- Subject: [ale] I can see why RHEL people don't use Emacs...
- From: lists at serioustechnology.com (Geoffrey Myers)
- Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2012 11:56:36 -0500
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAKjjLm=jbaKQXOuKjiG52eEnBruU=Jg3t5_v=cJmqaH+=g6hgg@mail.gmail.com> <CAN_S6qmbUZwUsENpc0iu+ee5szaT_sU3=zovomnZRCZdwT3ScQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAEo=5PyQc=k=EjQkjwx35LVSTLAUW2zoJSNHf76ebYOdhoRzmw@mail.gmail.com> <1654615985-1328744277-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1887398750-@b2.c14.bise6.blackberry> <CAEo=5PxJb_fD=jNODiyvN6QvqiLjzwwnjU2LOufW_smspzYV-Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAPfJb3qdme6shYRLL8n6JbS0d=KZsfSZj2cVU-7O9ANt+iZEgA@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Lightner, Jeff wrote:
> And the reason I used ksh on Linux until I realized I could simply do
> the "set -o vi" in bash as well. Some folks don't install ksh on
> Linux.
>
> Funny thing is we've got some DBAs that are convinced ksh works
> better for Oracle than bash even though we've proven their issues are
> environment setup and not shell. (Some of this went back to when we
> had to use pdksh because real ksh wasn't available in RHEL4 and
> before.)
Ah, but I've been using ksh since my days at AT&T (early 80's) when it
was an internal shell, unavailable to the rest of the world.
--
Until later, Geoffrey
"I predict future happiness for America if they can prevent
the government from wasting the labors of the people under
the pretense of taking care of them."
- Thomas Jefferson