[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ale] Fw: VirtualBox
- Subject: [ale] Fw: VirtualBox
- From: brian at polibyte.com (Brian Pitts)
- Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:20:55 -0500
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <1128437932-1292423809-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-925124460-@bda650.bisx.prod.on.blackberry> <[email protected]> <1896368331-1292425485-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1897010817-@bda650.bisx.prod.on.blackberry> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <1292431746.1868.108.camel@cfowler-desktop> <[email protected]>
On 12/15/2010 11:55 AM, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Yeah, I know about that product; I currently use Vmware-Server.
> Unfortunately it's been EOL'ed by vmware and there isn't a replacement,
> so basically I'm looking for something to migrate to. And no, moving to
> ESXi isn't an option.
>
> This is why I'm seriously considering KVM, as it wont "go away" anytime
> soon.. But I don't know if it has the level of remote management that I
> need.
Are virsh for command-line access and virt-manager for GUI access not
good enough? Frankly I think they're much better than vmware server's
flakey web interface and shoddy scripting support. See parts 30 and 31 of
http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html/Virtualization/index.html
--
All the best,
Brian Pitts