[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[ale] Ongoing vim vs. emacs

Subject: [ale] Ongoing vim vs. emacs
From: abarton at mindspring.com (Alexander Barton)
Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2008 19:42:45 -0400
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

Charles Shapiro wrote:
> ED IS THE TRUE PATH TO NIRVANA!  ED HAS BEEN THE CHOICE OF EDUCATED
> AND IGNORANT ALIKE FOR CENTURIES!  ED WILL NOT CORRUPT YOUR PRECIOUS
> BODILY FLUIDS!!  ED IS THE STANDARD TEXT EDITOR!  ED MAKES THE SUN
> SHINE AND THE BIRDS SING AND THE GRASS GREEN!!
> 
> 
> When I use an editor, I don't want eight extra KILOBYTES of worthless
> help screens and cursor positioning code!  I just want an EDitor!!
> Not a "viitor".  Not a "emacsitor".  Those aren't even WORDS!!!! ED!
> 
> ED! ED IS THE STANDARD!!!
> 
> http://www.geocities.com/kensanata/ed.html

Pah!  What BLOATWARE!  Real programmers use cat.

Follow-Ups:
- [ale] Ongoing vim vs. emacs
  - From: jim.kinney at gmail.com (Jim Kinney)

References:
- [ale] Ongoing vim vs. emacs
  - From: jlightner at water.com (Jeff Lightner)
- [ale] Ongoing vim vs. emacs
  - From: preston.lists at gmail.com (Preston Boyington)
- [ale] Ongoing vim vs. emacs
  - From: hooterpincher at gmail.com (Charles Shapiro)

Prev by Date: [ale] Backup's
Next by Date: [ale] Backup's
Previous by thread: [ale] Ongoing vim vs. emacs
Next by thread: [ale] Ongoing vim vs. emacs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread