[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[ale] Ongoing vim vs. emacs

Subject: [ale] Ongoing vim vs. emacs
From: preston.lists at gmail.com (Preston Boyington)
Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2008 13:38:47 -0500
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

Paul Cartwright wrote:
> On Tue June 3 2008, Preston Boyington wrote:
>> the majority is covered by GEdit (using plugins), Nano, or similar.
>>
> so you use a gedit plugin for emacs??

sorry, no.  i changed up Gedit to make my normal tasks a little easier.

very similar to:
http://grigio.org/pimp_my_gedit_was_textmate_linux

i don't even have emacs installed on anything anymore (which is a shame 
after buying the book...)

Follow-Ups:
- [ale] Ongoing vim vs. emacs
  - From: ale at pcartwright.com (Paul Cartwright)

References:
- [ale] Ongoing vim vs. emacs
  - From: jlightner at water.com (Jeff Lightner)
- [ale] Ongoing vim vs. emacs
  - From: preston.lists at gmail.com (Preston Boyington)
- [ale] Ongoing vim vs. emacs
  - From: ale at pcartwright.com (Paul Cartwright)

Prev by Date: [ale] Ongoing vim vs. emacs
Next by Date: [ale] Ongoing vim vs. emacs
Previous by thread: [ale] Ongoing vim vs. emacs
Next by thread: [ale] Ongoing vim vs. emacs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread