[no subject]

I found a BIOS setting that controls both L1 and L2 cache.

I have it disabled and memtest86 at startup indeed shows both L1 and
L2 are as slow as normal RAM.  So far so good.

Based on the feedback, I assume the Linux kernel will not override my
setting and enable cache?

Thanks
Greg
-- 
Greg Freemyer
The Norcross Group
Forensics for the 21st Century


</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<ul><li><strong>Follow-Ups</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00105" href="msg00105.html">[ale] Re: Disabling Cache?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> jdonline at gmail.com (J. D.)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00098" href="msg00098.html">[ale] Disabling Cache?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> greg.freemyer at gmail.com (Greg Freemyer)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00103" href="msg00103.html">[ale] Re: Disabling Cache?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> jdonline at gmail.com (J. D.)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00103.html">[ale] Re: Disabling Cache?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00105.html">[ale] Re: Disabling Cache?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00103.html">[ale] Re: Disabling Cache?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00105.html">[ale] Re: Disabling Cache?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00104"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00104"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>

<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>