[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[no subject]
- <!--x-content-type: text/plain -->
- <!--x-date: Sun Jul 3 11:23:31 2005 -->
- <!--x-from-r13: xnsxn ng nagvpuev.fg (Urbetr Qneyrff) -->
- <!--x-message-id: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] --> "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
- <!--x-subject: [ale] Two-part Bit Torrent Client? -->
- <li><em>date</em>: Sun Jul 3 11:23:31 2005</li>
- <li><em>from</em>: kafka at antichri.st (George Carless)</li>
- <li><em>in-reply-to</em>: <<a href="msg00038.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>references</em>: <<a href="msg00038.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>subject</em>: [ale] Two-part Bit Torrent Client?</li>
--George
On Sun, Jul 03, 2005 at 08:47:18AM -0400, David Corbin wrote:
> I'm only looking at bit torrent for the first time, so perhaps I'm way out of
> bounds. It seems to me there would be some value in having a two part client
> for those of us behind a NAT. Specifically, I'm thinking that there could be
> a server component on, or just outside the NATter. It would be the true
> client of the bit torrent protocol, and would be a daemon. Then, people
> inside the NAT could run clients that would talk to this server component.
>
> I believe, this would avoid the need to punch a whole in my firewall to get
> maximal throughput and follow good netiquette. One could even make the
> server component "stay connected" longer than the actual user, if necessary
> to fulfill "good behavior".
>
> Is there such a thing? Is this reasonable?
>
> David
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale">http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale</a>
>
--
--------------------------------------
George Carless ... kafka at antichri.st
Words are just dust in deserts of sound
</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<ul><li><strong>Follow-Ups</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00040" href="msg00040.html">[ale] Two-part Bit Torrent Client?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> dcorbin at machturtle.com (David Corbin)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00038" href="msg00038.html">[ale] Two-part Bit Torrent Client?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> dcorbin at machturtle.com (David Corbin)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00038.html">[ale] Two-part Bit Torrent Client?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00040.html">[ale] Two-part Bit Torrent Client?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00038.html">[ale] Two-part Bit Torrent Client?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00040.html">[ale] Two-part Bit Torrent Client?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00039"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00039"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>