[no subject]

I believe, this would avoid the need to punch a whole in my firewall to get 
maximal throughput and follow good netiquette.  One could even make the 
server component "stay connected" longer than the actual user, if necessary 
to fulfill "good behavior".

Is there such a thing?  Is this reasonable?

David


</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<ul><li><strong>Follow-Ups</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00039" href="msg00039.html">[ale] Two-part Bit Torrent Client?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> kafka at antichri.st (George Carless)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00037.html">[ale] Speedfactory DNS problems</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00039.html">[ale] Two-part Bit Torrent Client?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00037.html">[ale] Speedfactory DNS problems</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00039.html">[ale] Two-part Bit Torrent Client?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00038"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00038"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>

<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>