[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[no subject]
- <!--x-content-type: text/plain -->
- <!--x-date: Mon Oct 11 20:18:28 2004 -->
- <!--x-from-r13: wxvaarl ng ybpnyargfbyhgvbaf.pbz (Xnzrf B. Yvaarl WWW) -->
- <!--x-message-id: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected]-a-geek.com --> "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
- <!--x-subject: [ale] memory questions -->
- <li><em>date</em>: Mon Oct 11 20:18:28 2004</li>
- <li><em>from</em>: jkinney at localnetsolutions.com (James P. Kinney III)</li>
- <li><em>in-reply-to</em>: <<a href="msg00406.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>references</em>: <<a href="msg00406.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>subject</em>: [ale] memory questions</li>
Unless the system _REQUIRES_ ECC Registered RAM, don't spend the money
as the mobo won't be able to use. It cost about 30% more that the
vanilla of the same speed and size.
For the BSD box, get more of the same speed stuff you have now.
Otherwise, the new faster stuff will be underclocked to speed match with
the slowest stuff. PC2100 is rather inexpensive (compared to it's ECC,
REG brethren that my Tyam boards are gobbling up faster than I can
afford - 1G PC133 REG ECC = $220. I'm not even looking at the 2G's! I
have 15 more slot. Then the divorce.)
>
>
> TIA!
>
> bjorn
>
> [1] I inherited a machine once that kept crashing. Couldn't figure it out
> until finally I checked the bios and discovered that ***RAM had been
> overclocked***. Not the ram's fault, but it makes me want to be extra
> careful.
>
>
> -------------------
> Bjorn Dittmer-Roche
> XO Audio LLC
>
> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.xowave.com">http://www.xowave.com</a>
> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.xoaudio.com">http://www.xoaudio.com</a>
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale">http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale</a>
>
> !DSPAM:416ae75e141602944213545!
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00406" href="msg00406.html">[ale] memory questions</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> bjorn at sccs.swarthmore.edu (Bjorn Dittmer-Roche)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00419.html">[ale] Slackware to drop Gnome?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00421.html">[ale] Compaq raid disk. How do I format?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00411.html">[ale] memory questions</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00422.html">[ale] memory questions</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00420"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00420"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>