[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ale] Its over. Maybe
- Subject: [ale] Its over. Maybe
- From: esoteric at 3times25.net (Geoffrey)
- Date: Wed Nov 3 21:04:17 2004
- In-reply-to: <1099532613.4626.32.camel@blue>
- References: <[email protected]> <1099500187.2194.7.camel@blue> <[email protected]> <1099528139.4626.2.camel@blue> <[email protected]> <1099529736.4626.18.camel@blue> <[email protected]> <1099532613.4626.32.camel@blue>
Jim Popovitch wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-11-03 at 20:14 -0500, Geoffrey wrote:
>
>
>> No, I'm not saying that I want to see the source. I meant what I
>> posted, 'review of the source code by an external non-partisan
>> entity.'
>
>
> How do you know this hasn't happened, and who are you to request that
> it should? Seriously, as an un-elected individual, your ability to
> command review is severely limited.
I know it's not happened because I follow this stuff very closely. Who
am I? I am an American citizen and I have every right to DEMAND that my
vote is properly registered. I sure will not rely on elected officials
to see to it that this is addressed.
>> Who, exactly has reviewed the Diebold systems, that is, besides
>> Diebold? Oh, and Cathy Cox?
>
>
> I'm betting many others... and I am accepting it to. Hint: get over
> it. ;)
You are wrong, and should do a bit of research.
--
Until later, Geoffrey