[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ale] Its over. Maybe
- Subject: [ale] Its over. Maybe
- From: esoteric at 3times25.net (Geoffrey)
- Date: Wed Nov 3 20:15:42 2004
- In-reply-to: <1099529736.4626.18.camel@blue>
- References: <[email protected]> <1099500187.2194.7.camel@blue> <[email protected]> <1099528139.4626.2.camel@blue> <[email protected]> <1099529736.4626.18.camel@blue>
Jim Popovitch wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-11-03 at 19:39 -0500, Geoffrey wrote:
>
>
>> I'd still like to be able to verify that my vote was counted
>> properly. You can not do this without a paper trail and review of
>> the source code by an external non-partisan entity. So closed
>> source isn't that bad, as long as there's more than one entity who
>> knows how it works.
>>
>
>
> Many people (entities too) have looked at Diebold. I think what you
> are really saying is that you won't believe your vote counted until
> YOU see the source. I'm happy trusting others, esp in this case
> where there has been so much recent focus, and esp others more
> qualified.
No, I'm not saying that I want to see the source. I meant what I
posted, 'review of the source code by an external non-partisan entity.'
Who, exactly has reviewed the Diebold systems, that is, besides Diebold?
Oh, and Cathy Cox?
--
Until later, Geoffrey