[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[no subject]



Doug McNash wrote:

>Check out 
>
&gt;<a  rel="nofollow" href="http://www.whiteboxlinux.org/faq.html";>http://www.whiteboxlinux.org/faq.html</a>
&gt;
&gt;about the middle of the page lists a few apt repositories I have not
&gt;tried yet.
&gt;
&gt;Whitebox Linux (~=REL3.0) uses yum and provides a update repository. 
&gt;Yum seems to work as well as apt but unfortuatly the Whitebox sites seem
&gt;to have bandwith problems.
&gt;
&gt;On Thu, 2004-07-01 at 15:14, Dow Hurst wrote:
&gt;  
&gt;
&gt;&gt;If looking for apt repositories to add software to RHEL3.0 for Workstations, 
&gt;&gt;what repositories would be appropriate?  I've gotten apt-get installed and 
&gt;&gt;also checkinstall by using the Fedora Core 1.0.  However, if I want to get KDE 
&gt;&gt;installed so I have access to K3B, the very nice DVD burning app, what 
&gt;&gt;repositories would work properly?  Currently, I also found a repository for 
&gt;&gt;apt that has KDE ready to install that has RHEL3.0, however, after attempting 
&gt;&gt;the install, I got conflicts with OO1.1 and SunJava links into Mozilla.  That 
&gt;&gt;seems such a trivial conflict yet the installation died.  Better to have 
&gt;&gt;apt-get not force the install than to cause conflicts.  Any advice?
&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;After dealing with rpm hell a few times, I am really liking apt-get.  If 
&gt;&gt;anyone is interested, I'd be happy to pass on my info and links once I've got 
&gt;&gt;the kinks worked out.
&gt;&gt;Dow
&gt;&gt;    
&gt;&gt;
&gt;
&gt;_______________________________________________
&gt;Ale mailing list
&gt;Ale at ale.org
&gt;<a  rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale";>http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale</a>
&gt;
&gt;  
&gt;



</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00011" href="msg00011.html">[ale] EL3.0 comparable to Fedora 1,2 or RH9?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> dhurst at kennesaw.edu (Dow Hurst)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00050" href="msg00050.html">[ale] EL3.0 comparable to Fedora 1,2 or RH9?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> dmcnash at charter.net (Doug McNash)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00050.html">[ale] EL3.0 comparable to Fedora 1,2 or RH9?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00052.html">[ale] less spam is good</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00050.html">[ale] EL3.0 comparable to Fedora 1,2 or RH9?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00012.html">[ale] Linux Web cams</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00051"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00051"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>

<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>