[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[no subject]
- <!--x-content-type: text/plain -->
- <!--x-date: Sat Jul 3 10:21:03 2004 -->
- <!--x-from-r13: qzpanfu ng punegre.arg (Rbht [p@nfu) -->
- <!--x-message-id: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] --> "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
- <!--x-subject: [ale] EL3.0 comparable to Fedora 1,2 or RH9? -->
- <li><em>date</em>: Sat Jul 3 10:21:03 2004</li>
- <li><em>from</em>: dmcnash at charter.net (Doug McNash)</li>
- <li><em>in-reply-to</em>: <<a href="msg00011.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>references</em>: <<a href="msg00011.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>subject</em>: [ale] EL3.0 comparable to Fedora 1,2 or RH9?</li>
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.whiteboxlinux.org/faq.html">http://www.whiteboxlinux.org/faq.html</a>
about the middle of the page lists a few apt repositories I have not
tried yet.
Whitebox Linux (~=REL3.0) uses yum and provides a update repository.
Yum seems to work as well as apt but unfortuatly the Whitebox sites seem
to have bandwith problems.
On Thu, 2004-07-01 at 15:14, Dow Hurst wrote:
> If looking for apt repositories to add software to RHEL3.0 for Workstations,
> what repositories would be appropriate? I've gotten apt-get installed and
> also checkinstall by using the Fedora Core 1.0. However, if I want to get KDE
> installed so I have access to K3B, the very nice DVD burning app, what
> repositories would work properly? Currently, I also found a repository for
> apt that has KDE ready to install that has RHEL3.0, however, after attempting
> the install, I got conflicts with OO1.1 and SunJava links into Mozilla. That
> seems such a trivial conflict yet the installation died. Better to have
> apt-get not force the install than to cause conflicts. Any advice?
>
> After dealing with rpm hell a few times, I am really liking apt-get. If
> anyone is interested, I'd be happy to pass on my info and links once I've got
> the kinks worked out.
> Dow
</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<ul><li><strong>Follow-Ups</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00051" href="msg00051.html">[ale] EL3.0 comparable to Fedora 1,2 or RH9?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> Dow.Hurst at mindspring.com (Dow Hurst)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00011" href="msg00011.html">[ale] EL3.0 comparable to Fedora 1,2 or RH9?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> dhurst at kennesaw.edu (Dow Hurst)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00049.html">[ale] Vi editor paragraph formatting command</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00051.html">[ale] EL3.0 comparable to Fedora 1,2 or RH9?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00011.html">[ale] EL3.0 comparable to Fedora 1,2 or RH9?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00051.html">[ale] EL3.0 comparable to Fedora 1,2 or RH9?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00050"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00050"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>