[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ale] Upgrading to Apache 2 on RH 7.3
- Subject: [ale] Upgrading to Apache 2 on RH 7.3
- From: synco at xodarap.net (synco gibraldter)
- Date: Mon Sep 15 23:59:35 2003
forgive the forward, as the reply-to thing didn't go to the list
------- Forwarded message follows -------
From: synco gibraldter <synco at xodarap.net>
To: Howard Fore <mylists at hofo.com>
Subject: Re: [ale] Upgrading to Apache 2 on RH 7.3
Date sent: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 23:25:29 -0400
i hate to play devil's advocate (yet again), but with a source install
time of ~ 5 mins, do rpm's really offer any advantage whatsoever over
installing from source?
i install everything from source and i never have problems with
dependencies or upgrades or any mess like that. i'm admittedly very
weak on my rpm knowledge, so i'm not trying to be a jackass by asking
this question -- i really just don't see the advantages to rpm's (and
i can think of a few disadvantages).
holla.
------- End of forwarded message -------
-- synco gibraldter
-- atlanta, ga
-- synco at xodarap.net
-- key id: 0xC5117E0A