[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ale] Enlightenment not there?
- Subject: [ale] Enlightenment not there?
- From: m at wroth.com (michael mcdermott)
- Date: Tue, 09 Feb 1999 17:12:53 -0500
I know, but I am pretty sure that the RPMS are wildly out of date.
It is definately not the recommended way to install enlightenment.
I tried doing it like that the first time and it never worked. It takes a while
to compile some of the libraries though.
Wandered Inn wrote:
>
> michael mcdermott wrote:
> >
> > You did install all the libraries that Enlightenment needs in the right order
> > first, correct?
> >
> > I don't understand why you are using rpms?
>
> For someone relatively new to Linux, I would suggest sticking to rpms.
>
> --
> Until later: Geoffrey esoteric at denali.atlnet.com
>
> You mean you paid MONEY for Service Pack '98????
--
"Of course the void is nothinginess. By knowing things that exist,
you can know that which does not exist. That is the void."
-Shinmem Musashi, The Book of the Void.