[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Dual Homed BGP
- Subject: Dual Homed BGP
- From: mel at beckman.org (Mel Beckman)
- Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2020 16:46:55 +0000
- In-reply-to: <CAASS9CTBrMQpw11QP1HaFK1_f+xcp3j4epWd6Ex=fmBdADFWrQ@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAASS9CTBrMQpw11QP1HaFK1_f+xcp3j4epWd6Ex=fmBdADFWrQ@mail.gmail.com>
Itâ??s pretty pointless for a small ISP to get full routes, because the BGP tables are so highly manipulated. Itâ??s better to just get â??companyâ?? routes for each upstream, and then use your own traffic engineering via prepending and static or policy routes to balance the outbound traffic the way you like.
-mel
> On Jan 24, 2020, at 8:40 AM, Brian <brian.bsi at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> 
> Hello all. I am having a hard time trying to articulate why a Dual Home ISP should have full tables. My understanding has always been that full tables when dual homed allow much more control. Especially in helping to prevent Async routes.
>
>
> Am I crazy?