[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

DDoS Mitigation Survey

Subject: DDoS Mitigation Survey
From: rubensk at gmail.com (Rubens Kuhl)
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2020 13:33:04 -0300
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <CANtoEQFeNteFED-eWKwyy0V_-oiUAdKCbSaHSuVz-ez1RHMcPQ@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 12:49 PM Jean | ddostest.me via NANOG <
nanog at nanog.org> wrote:

> uRPF loose or strict.
>
> Which ISP supports it?
>
> So far, I found none through public information.
>
>
With all IPv4 space converging to being allocated, loose uRPF is almost
useless at this point, or will be soon.

Rubens
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20200120/e1051020/attachment.html>

References:
- DDoS Mitigation Survey
  - From: luminshi at cs.uoregon.edu (Lumin Shi)
- DDoS Mitigation Survey
  - From: Roland.Dobbins at netscout.com (Dobbins, Roland)
- DDoS Mitigation Survey
  - From: jean at ddostest.me (Jean | ddostest.me)
- DDoS Mitigation Survey
  - From: Roland.Dobbins at netscout.com (Dobbins, Roland)
- DDoS Mitigation Survey
  - From: jean at ddostest.me (Jean | ddostest.me)

Prev by Date: DDoS Mitigation Survey
Next by Date: DDoS Mitigation Survey
Previous by thread: DDoS Mitigation Survey
Next by thread: DDoS Mitigation Survey
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread