[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Mx204 alternative
- Subject: Mx204 alternative
- From: adamv0025 at netconsultings.com (adamv0025 at netconsultings.com)
- Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2019 13:11:17 +0100
- In-reply-to: <CAAeewD9t5KGaMwbU=Kc4WFqPRJmrHnNRH63aK+zgbxB7Zi2Tww@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CA+LTh5UUbV7YNFZOh0b88-4H46VvtksVgTyRRKttmqX0__cDSw@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAPkb-7CgG+jOTPEuc7Vhrn-4fz_YeNPr+Yzk3aoapCNz+VqQOw@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAPkb-7CtjvdhU=UrKBstDsM2zCGnxrsYzne4YT3v0DAqXYYPCw@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAAeewD9t5KGaMwbU=Kc4WFqPRJmrHnNRH63aK+zgbxB7Zi2Tww@mail.gmail.com>
> From: Saku Ytti <saku at ytti.fi>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 3, 2019 9:55 AM
>
> On Tue, 3 Sep 2019 at 10:27, Å?ukasz Bromirski <lukasz at bromirski.net> wrote:
>
> > 64B traffic simply doesnâ??t happen apart from DDoS scenarios, so why
> > bother at all? Customers anyway want to use dedicated
>
>
> And like you said, QoS and filters usually have 0 pps cost.
>
Not true.
This is the case only in fixed pipelines.
adam