[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Mx204 alternative
- Subject: Mx204 alternative
- From: olivier.benghozi at wifirst.fr (Olivier Benghozi)
- Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2019 18:02:06 +0200
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <CA+LTh5UUbV7YNFZOh0b88-4H46VvtksVgTyRRKttmqX0__cDSw@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAPkb-7CgG+jOTPEuc7Vhrn-4fz_YeNPr+Yzk3aoapCNz+VqQOw@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAPkb-7CtjvdhU=UrKBstDsM2zCGnxrsYzne4YT3v0DAqXYYPCw@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]>
By the way they now say in this KB article that they implemented a «high performance mode» for MX204 / MX10003 with some «set chassis fpc slot high-performance-mode».
Anyone wiling to test? :)
> Le 2 sept. 2019 à 15:23, Denys Fedoryshchenko <nuclearcat at nuclearcat.com> a écrit :
>
> From snabbco discussion, issue #1013, "If you read Intel datasheets then the minimum packet rate they are guaranteeing is 64B for 10G (82599), 128B for 40G (XL710), and 256B for 100G (FM10K)."
>
> But "hardware", ASIC enabled routers such as MX might be not better and even need some tuning.
> https://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=KB33477&actp=METADATA
> "On summit MX204 and MX10003 platforms, the line rate frame size is 119 byte for 10/40GbE port and 95 byte for 100GbE port."
- Follow-Ups:
- Mx204 alternative
- From: adamv0025 at netconsultings.com (adamv0025 at netconsultings.com)