[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Mx204 alternative
- Subject: Mx204 alternative
- From: mark.tinka at seacom.mu (Mark Tinka)
- Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2019 12:26:52 +0200
- In-reply-to: <CAO1bj=Yp8XeSf6vMYQcuiMx5_YoY-eJEDhzSEx3wTO9Xpk9RrQ@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CA+LTh5UUbV7YNFZOh0b88-4H46VvtksVgTyRRKttmqX0__cDSw@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAO1bj=ZsOCLYdGkBYV=E3yB3CHsBcYiqRh8S8piOMtz27on=BQ@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAO1bj=Yp8XeSf6vMYQcuiMx5_YoY-eJEDhzSEx3wTO9Xpk9RrQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 2/Sep/19 11:24, Aled Morris wrote:
>
>
> Sorry I have no inside info, only what's been released publicly.
We stayed away from the ACX5000 because the Broadcom chip in there
wasn't great for high-touch services.
I hope this ACX700 has a better plan.
Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20190902/afdfcc01/attachment.html>