[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Disney+ Streaming
- Subject: Disney+ Streaming
- From: brian at interlinx.bc.ca (Brian J. Murrell)
- Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2019 21:34:00 -0500
- In-reply-to: <CAEmG1=r12xZ4MOQ3GcL9eX=+E1K5jq0pUpwxdZ5+tk=Yax7woQ@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <151386.1573590394@turing-police> <[email protected]> <CAEmG1=oLYu0PNo3zraA4UQEZbPM45Uzp4NT1TeapiKiwRkNmTQ@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAEmG1=r12xZ4MOQ3GcL9eX=+E1K5jq0pUpwxdZ5+tk=Yax7woQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 2019-11-12 at 15:32 -0800, Matthew Petach wrote:
> My point was that Disney has a lock on much of the content kids love.
Which was, until Disney+, on Netflix.
https://www.theverge.com/2012/12/4/3727688/netflix-streaming-rights-new-disney-marvel-pixar-movies
> Netflix/HBO/AmazonPrime, not so much.
The above article (and the number of kids in my life with their
eyeballs constantly glued to TV screens) says otherwise.
> So, the new eyeballs aren't going to be from parents watching
> different
> shows, it'll be from parents watching their adult-ish stuff, while
> the kids
> are happily ensconced with Disney+.
But those little eyeballs aren't new. They have already been watching
as much streaming as their parents would allow -- unrestricted in
probably too many cases.
> I called out Game of Thrones and Good Omens as shows that are popular
> with
> adults but that aren't terribly family friendly, so you won't be
> getting
> many 12-and-unders watching them.
No, instead they were already watching the ass-barn-load of kids
content that is on the existing streaming services.
b.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20191112/f99d2120/attachment.sig>