[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Spamming of NANOG list members



On 5/24/19 4:11 PM, Eric Tykwinski wrote:
> I guess you donâ??t get Comcast abuse reports, below is an example: 
> "e7f05f85ba44ad3393e7b086eed202ee b2cca3a3ae3825c36999e12722e83830" 
> <eed6df6cd94ee61a5091e4d46af49993 at gmail.com>, 
> "Ed d95a762f93c99703afe76d25f1679ea4" 
> <d9bf58b67f09a3bec99fff00b2f12160 at comcast.net>

Those look like they are probably MD5 hashes (I'm guessing) of names.

So your proposed algorithm would be trivial to extend to add MD5 hashes 
of permutations.



-- 
Grant. . . .
unix || die

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4008 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20190524/8c2146fc/attachment.bin>