[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
BGP prefix filter list
- Subject: BGP prefix filter list
- From: bill at herrin.us (William Herrin)
- Date: Fri, 24 May 2019 11:22:48 -0700
- In-reply-to: <730542563.4590.1558718919496.JavaMail.mhammett@ThunderFuck>
- References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAL9Qcx73SZ-o=1V8htNywMSjrCKZVUNnAifA4XSMgHKxp_hLXA@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CA+FDdDRsPdZoGKDoA_L=GC=a880PM+ygrdQR836zvZj_3WuZgQ@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <730542563.4590.1558718919496.JavaMail.mhammett@ThunderFuck>
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 10:29 AM Mike Hammett <nanog at ics-il.net> wrote:
> If networks are going to make unconventional announcements, I'm not
> concerned if they suffer because of it.
>
No, no no. You're not getting it.
I'm a customer of Verizon. I'm a customer of CenturyLink. I get a /24 from
CenturyLink and announce it via my two carriers: Verizon and CenturyLink.
CenturyLink also announces the aggregate, let's say /16 that the /24 is a
part of because all of the /16 containing my /24 is their allocation.
Get it? I announce the /24 via both so that you can reach me when there is
a problem with one or the other. If you drop the /24, you break the
Internet when my connection to CenturyLink is inoperable. Good job!
There is nothing unconventional about this arrangement. It was commonplace
before ARIN dropped the minimum end-user assignment to /24 and many
networks who themselves up that way have found it inconvenient to renumber.
Regards,
Bill Herrin
--
William Herrin
bill at herrin.us
https://bill.herrin.us/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20190524/a28e964f/attachment.html>