Was wrong Re: Did IPv6 between HE and Google ever get resolved?

[jlewis at lewis.org (Jon Lewis)]

I think what you were remembering is Cogent/Google and Cogent/HE are both 
IPv6 issues where the parties can't agree on peering vs transit for the v6 
relationship.

On Thu, 28 Mar 2019, David Hubbard wrote:

> 
> Oops, I was corrected that HE doesnâ??t have IPv6 issues with Google, not sure why I had that in my head.  Cogent certainly does but something had me thinking thereâ??s another big name
> that has the same problem.
> 
> Â 
> 
> David
> 
> Â 
> 
> From: NANOG <nanog-bounces at nanog.org> on behalf of David Hubbard <dhubbard at dino.hostasaurus.com>
> Date: Thursday, March 28, 2019 at 12:40 PM
> To: NANOG List <nanog at nanog.org>
> Subject: Did IPv6 between HE and Google ever get resolved?
> 
> Â 
> 
> Hey all, Iâ??ve been having bad luck searching around, but did IPv6 transit between HE and google ever get resolved?  Ironically, I can now get to them cheaply from a location we
> currently have equipment that has been Cogent-only, so if it fixes the IPv6 issue Iâ??d like to make the move.  Anyone peer with HE in general and want to share their experience
> offlist?  With the price, if theyâ??re a good option, Iâ??d consider rolling them in to other locations where we have redundancy already, so the v6 isnâ??t as big a deal there.
> 
> Â 
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Â 
> 
> 
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------
  Jon Lewis, MCP :)           |  I route
                              |  therefore you are
_________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________