[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
few big monolithic PEs vs many small PEs
- Subject: few big monolithic PEs vs many small PEs
- From: mark.tinka at seacom.mu (Mark Tinka)
- Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 07:59:19 +0200
- In-reply-to: <2035582630.1984.1561677835743.JavaMail.mhammett@ThunderFuck>
- References: <[email protected]> <2035582630.1984.1561677835743.JavaMail.mhammett@ThunderFuck>
On 28/Jun/19 01:23, Mike Hammett wrote:
> I've ran into many providers where they had routers in the top 10 or
> 15 markets... Â and that was it. If you wanted a connection in South
> Bend or Indianapolis or New Orleans or Ohio or... Â you were backhauled
> potentially hundreds of miles to a nearby big market.
>
> More smaller POPs reduces the tromboning.
>
> More smaller POPs means that one POP's outage isn't as disastrous on
> the traffic rerouting around it.
I really dislike centralized routing.
Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20190628/4f60ff34/attachment.html>