[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Crowdfunding critical infrastructure
- Subject: Crowdfunding critical infrastructure
- From: mel at beckman.org (Mel Beckman)
- Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 22:34:33 +0000
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]> <CA+LTh5VADNq9jH4id66vzvcuyZQhG1SgJ-H9oonLLDeDHH=+yw@mail.gmail.com>, <[email protected]>
Eric,
Not to go too far afield, but Iâ??m also not on anyoneâ??s payroll, so I buy my own individual-plan health insurance. Yes, itâ??s more expensive, but thatâ??s the price of not having just one boss :)
-mel beckman
> On Jun 27, 2019, at 10:46 AM, Eric S. Raymond <esr at thyrsus.com> wrote:
>
> Mehmet Akcin <mehmet at akcin.net>:
>>> On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 08:41 Eric S. Raymond <esr at thyrsus.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> The members of this list are, I think, much more aware tham most that
>>> a lot of critical Internet software is maintained by unfunded
>>> volunteers, and of the systemic risks that result from this.
>>
>> Please explain. This is not true.
>
> Tell it to Dave Taht, who broke his health solving the bufferbloat problem.
>
> Tell it to Patrick Volkerding, who sweated to created the first Linux
> distribution - inventing a whole tier of infrastructure we now take
> for granted - only to end up in deep financial trouble because other
> people make all the money selling the CDs.
>
> Tell it to me, leading GIFLIB and GPSD and NTPsec and 48 other
> projects and looking at having my life savings possibly wiped out by a
> relatively low-grade medical problem because I'm not on anyone's
> payroll.
>
> Tell it to Harlan Stenn, who worked on NTP for over a decade and could
> barely get anyone to kick in enough money to buy coffee.
>
> If you do not understand the scope of this problem, you are *astoundingly*
> ignorant. And probably alone on this list.
>
>> This needs governance and transparency around it. Just launching a page
>> isnâ??t going to get you anywhere â??sustsinableâ??
>
> Every loadsharer keeps control of their money at all times. Nobody is
> makng decisions for them; the most the advisers can do is suggest
> priorities. Everyting happens in public. How does it get more
> transparent than that?
> --
> <a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a>
>
>