Traffic ratio of an ISP

[prasun at nevada.unr.edu (Prasun Dey)]

Thanks Valdis for mentioning the classifications. Iâ??ve used ISPs as generic word. But, youâ??re right, itâ??d be better if I had distinguished the CPs, ISPs or the Transits specifically. However, thanks to the community, theyâ??ve understood and provided me some really helpful answers. 

-
Prasun

Regards,
Prasun Kanti Dey
Ph.D. Candidate,
Dept of Electrical and Computer Engineering,
University of Central Florida
web: https://prasunkantidey.github.io/portfolio/

> On Jun 19, 2019, at 10:10 PM, Valdis KlÄ?tnieks <valdis.kletnieks at vt.edu> wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 19 Jun 2019 11:05:40 -0400, Prasun Dey said:
> 
>> Iâ??ve seen from PeeringDB that every ISP reveals its traffic ratio as Heavy/
>> Mostly Inbound or Balanced or Heavy/ Mostly Outbound.
>> Iâ??m wondering if there is any specific ratio numbers for them
> 
> If they're an ISP that sells to end user consumers, they're going to be a heavy
> eyeball traffic - all the big packets are coming inbound from content providers and
> going to consumers.
> 
> Content providers will of course show lots of big packets heading outwards toward
> eyeball networks - but those usually aren't called ISPs.
> 
> If they're selling mostly transit, then they're more likely to be balanced, but
> again, then they're probably not really an "ISP" as the word is usually used.
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20190620/8984a595/attachment.html>