[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

BGP Experiment

Subject: BGP Experiment
From: james.jun at towardex.com (James Jun)
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 14:01:46 -0500
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <CADbXrd2QJYi6eWW6KBhaWANk=RhzfoHoypDHjZZHFw+pHw3tnA@mail.gmail.com> <CADbXrd3RpOBQ80kq66Qop992Ov4Ppsxm3GvFKgny2rSk3cSGLg@mail.gmail.com> <CAPZQKs8aVT=7gJdGcoC-KOPDR0F4Ms33KAKKG5-4k96SVCSFEw@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 06:45:50PM +0000, Nikolas Geyer wrote:
> Throwing my support behind continuing the experiment also. A singular complaint from a company advertising unallocated ASN and IPv4 resources (the irony) does not warrant cessation of the experiment.

Agreed;  Please resume the experiment.  We're all operators here, and we MUST have confidence 
that BGP speakers on our network are compliant with protocol specification.  Experiments like
this are opportunities for a real-life validation of how our devices handle messages that are
out of the norm, and help us identify issues.

Kudos to researchers by the way, for sending courtesy announcements in advance, and testing 
against some common platforms available to them (Cisco, Quagga & BIRD) prior to the experiment.

James

Follow-Ups:
- BGP Experiment
  - From: christoffer at netravnen.de (Christoffer Hansen)
- BGP Experiment
  - From: mark.tinka at seacom.mu (Mark Tinka)
- BGP Experiment
  - From: adamv0025 at netconsultings.com (adamv0025 at netconsultings.com)

References:
- BGP Experiment
  - From: cunha at dcc.ufmg.br (Italo Cunha)
- BGP Experiment
  - From: ben at packet.gg (Ben Cooper)
- BGP Experiment
  - From: christoffer at netravnen.de (Christoffer Hansen)
- BGP Experiment
  - From: nik at neko.id.au (Nikolas Geyer)

Prev by Date: BGP Experiment
Next by Date: BGP Experiment
Previous by thread: BGP Experiment
Next by thread: BGP Experiment
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread