SMTP Over TLS on Port 26 - Implicit TLS Proposal [Feedback Request]

[douglasroyer at gmail.com (Doug Royer)]

On 1/11/19 10:38 AM, Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan wrote:
> Hello NANOG, Belated new year wishes.
> 
> I would like to gather some feedback from you all.
> 
> I'm trying to propose two things to the Internet Standard and it's 
> related to SMTP.

Your post to this list was (according to the headers):
     11 Jan 2019 23:08:21 +0530

Yet on the IETF-smtp mailing list at:
     Wed, 9 Jan 2019 12:29:43 +0530

*You* wrote (in part):
   I'm the guy who proposed SMTP Over TLS on Port 26. Looks like that was
   dead end. So, now coming with another proposal.

Question: Why did you post something on NANOG that you already declared 
to the IETF yourself as a "dead end" 2 days earlier? I read all of the 
IETF emails on this idea. They explained why it is currently a 
no-starter as proposed.

-- 

Doug Royer - (http://DougRoyer.US  http://goo.gl/yrxJTu )
DouglasRoyer at gmail.com
714-989-6135

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4000 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20190111/9a5a9e59/attachment.bin>