[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

yet another round of SMTP Over TLS on Port 26 - Implicit TLS Proposal [Feedback Request]

Subject: yet another round of SMTP Over TLS on Port 26 - Implicit TLS Proposal [Feedback Request]
From: Brian at ampr.org (Brian Kantor)
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2019 14:03:34 -0800
In-reply-to: <CAOEezJSncWi3OpERN10EBQYKuMr6MkaakhboPuY66KccprXKmQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAOEezJQ0mJYvKW=SdbbE4ZC2Vx6_9FD5Z0SpkF2840r580vZ5w@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAOEezJSncWi3OpERN10EBQYKuMr6MkaakhboPuY66KccprXKmQ@mail.gmail.com>

>From this point forward, all mail containing the phrase "TLS on
port 26" in the Subject line will be shunted into my junk mail box,
unread, because I do not wish to see any more correspondence on
this matter.

'procmail' is my friend.
	- Brian


On Sun, Jan 13, 2019 at 03:20:26AM +0530, Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan wrote:
> Hello Mr. Levine,
> 	[...]

Follow-Ups:
- yet another round of SMTP Over TLS on Port 26 - Implicit TLS Proposal [Feedback Request]
  - From: giri at dombox.org (Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan)

References:
- SMTP Over TLS on Port 26 - Implicit TLS Proposal [Feedback Request]
  - From: giri at dombox.org (Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan)
- yet another round of SMTP Over TLS on Port 26 - Implicit TLS Proposal [Feedback Request]
  - From: johnl at iecc.com (John Levine)
- yet another round of SMTP Over TLS on Port 26 - Implicit TLS Proposal [Feedback Request]
  - From: giri at dombox.org (Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan)

Prev by Date: yet another round of SMTP Over TLS on Port 26 - Implicit TLS Proposal [Feedback Request]
Next by Date: yet another round of SMTP Over TLS on Port 26 - Implicit TLS Proposal [Feedback Request]
Previous by thread: yet another round of SMTP Over TLS on Port 26 - Implicit TLS Proposal [Feedback Request]
Next by thread: yet another round of SMTP Over TLS on Port 26 - Implicit TLS Proposal [Feedback Request]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread