[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

BGP Experiment

Subject: BGP Experiment
From: jared at puck.nether.net (Jared Mauch)
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2019 12:20:32 -0500
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <CADbXrd2QJYi6eWW6KBhaWANk=RhzfoHoypDHjZZHFw+pHw3tnA@mail.gmail.com> <CADbXrd0fBQxihw-RttMfXAASgx6ynPBuLtHcfsN6ja5-Xcfq=g@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAF664DwfOT2UW9FbXF1G+MH-c4Q1uENXqTfXBSyK9LHaTtORXg@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]>


> On Jan 8, 2019, at 12:10 PM, niels=nanog at bakker.net wrote:
> 
> * thomasammon at gmail.com (Tom Ammon) [Tue 08 Jan 2019, 17:59 CET]:
>> There are a fair number of open source BGP implementations now. It would require additional effort to test all of them.
> 
> In the real world, doing the correct thing is often harder than doing an incorrect thing, yes.
> 

And other times you just get BGP as art

https://twitter.com/powerdns_bert/status/878291436034170881

- jared

References:
- BGP Experiment
  - From: cunha at dcc.ufmg.br (Italo Cunha)
- BGP Experiment
  - From: niels=nanog at bakker.net (niels=nanog at bakker.net)
- BGP Experiment
  - From: thomasammon at gmail.com (Tom Ammon)
- BGP Experiment
  - From: niels=nanog at bakker.net (niels=nanog at bakker.net)

Prev by Date: BGP Experiment
Next by Date: BGP Experiment
Previous by thread: BGP Experiment
Next by thread: BGP Experiment
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread