BGP topological vs centralized route reflector

[adamv0025 at netconsultings.com (adamv0025 at netconsultings.com)]

I seem to remember there were some good old (really old now) books on BGP discussing various design aspects of BGP infrastructure including topology-based or address-based route reflection, etc...

Topology-based doesnâ??t need to mean in-path you can still have a whole fleet of out-of-the-path RRs servicing say south-east region.  

My advice is: 

-Keep your RR-1 infra separate form RR-2 infra (when RR1&RR2=same cluster). 

-Keep your Internet-RRs and Services-RRs infrastructures separate (ships in night), which is very easy to pull off with current virtualized RRs. 

-Type-1 RDs will help you simulate full-mesh.  

 

 

adam

 

From: NANOG <nanog-bounces at nanog.org> On Behalf Of Mohammad Khalil
Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2019 8:10 PM
To: nanog at nanog.org
Subject: BGP topological vs centralized route reflector

 

Dears

Am trying to find some documents and practical implementations regarding bgp topological vs centralized route reflector(In-band vs out-of-band)

 

Any good shares are appreciated

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20190219/2c229dc7/attachment.html>