[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Internet diameter?
- Subject: Internet diameter?
- From: morrowc.lists at gmail.com (Christopher Morrow)
- Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 22:58:32 -0500
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <CAP-guGXN4MhShfcP8cU=se-nsUJhXWQttEXPSGmC+J8LVRpSFw@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CA+FDdDQMKdBqFj5-OuvrmRLkHQ0Q=O2y9qPET8thN+igh3gkAg@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
42
now, why does it matter?
On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 10:49 PM Aaron1 <aaron1 at gvtc.com> wrote:
> Yes I agree Ross/Stephen. I didnâ??t mean to overstate the CDN fact.
>
> I wonder what the answer is to Billâ??s question is. â??average, median and
>
> maximum diameter (ip hop count) of the Internet? â??
>
>
> Aaron
>
> On Nov 21, 2018, at 9:44 PM, Stephen Satchell <list at satchell.net> wrote:
>
> On 11/21/2018 07:32 PM, Ross Tajvar wrote:
>
> I'd argue that's just content (though admittedly a lot of it). You can't
>
> cache, e.g., a SIP trunk, and offices which need to connect to each other
>
> can't cache one another in a CDN either.
>
>
>
> I would further argue that you can't cache active Web content, like bank
> account statements, utility billing, help desk request/responses,
> equipment status, and other things that change constantly.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20181121/5be5cfe5/attachment.html>