[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

IGP protocol

Subject: IGP protocol
From: aled.w.morris at googlemail.com (Aled Morris)
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 08:34:36 +0000
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <CAH_tYHKhrwW3hXAig5KpzsDp+TvPwPc6dWdNeukxP=3XDv0qHA@mail.gmail.com> <9578293AE169674F9A048B2BC9A081B4030D42FA0F@MUNPRDMBXA1.medline.com> <[email protected]>

On Tue, 13 Nov 2018 at 05:54, Brandon Martin <lists.nanog at monmotha.net>
wrote:

> I was of the impression that there was a draft or similar for
> single-topology (IPv4+IPv6) OSPF.  Did anything ever come of that?
>
>
Juniper support IPv4 families ("realms") in OSPFv3.

Aled
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20181113/731682a2/attachment.html>

Follow-Ups:
- IGP protocol
  - From: toebinoz at gmail.com (Tashi Phuntsho)

References:
- IGP protocol
  - From: nanog at netfront.jp (im)
- IGP protocol
  - From: SNaslund at medline.com (Naslund, Steve)
- IGP protocol
  - From: lists.nanog at monmotha.net (Brandon Martin)

Prev by Date: IGP protocol
Next by Date: IGP protocol
Previous by thread: IGP protocol
Next by thread: IGP protocol
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread