[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

IGP protocol

Subject: IGP protocol
From: SNaslund at medline.com (Naslund, Steve)
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 20:35:47 +0000
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <CAH_tYHKhrwW3hXAig5KpzsDp+TvPwPc6dWdNeukxP=3XDv0qHA@mail.gmail.com> <9578293AE169674F9A048B2BC9A081B4030D42FA0F@MUNPRDMBXA1.medline.com> <[email protected]>

Yeah there are those.  

Steve

-----Original Message-----
From: Valdis Kletnieks <valdis at vt.edu> On Behalf Of valdis.kletnieks at vt.edu
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2018 2:29 PM
To: Naslund, Steve <SNaslund at medline.com>
Cc: nanog at nanog.org
Subject: Re: IGP protocol

On Mon, 12 Nov 2018 20:21:26 +0000, "Naslund, Steve" said:

> 2.  Most corporate networks will be running OSPF and/or EIGRP as an IGP.

And I'm sure there's still some crazies out there using RIPv2. :)

References:
- IGP protocol
  - From: nanog at netfront.jp (im)
- IGP protocol
  - From: SNaslund at medline.com (Naslund, Steve)
- IGP protocol
  - From: valdis.kletnieks at vt.edu (valdis.kletnieks at vt.edu)

Prev by Date: IGP protocol
Next by Date: Escalation point at Google
Previous by thread: IGP protocol
Next by thread: IGP protocol
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread