[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Juniper BGP Convergence Time
- Subject: Juniper BGP Convergence Time
- From: hugo at slabnet.com (Hugo Slabbert)
- Date: Thu, 17 May 2018 08:17:11 -0700
- In-reply-to: <CALYr0GCV+Lk0DCF3AoE6FD1+KK_Gk3vsGBxzAC-=wEqgPitKvw@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CALYr0GCydnc23Do1v_K+g033A1o3aDmO+7AC2LtYWx2kzonpNg@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAC+beqzFTmAia_DPKy6b1C7zGk_7FqHW=VRFDxJSfJq_ZQrTmw@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CALYr0GCriGOzocGvuCVsyaPu_vOeV5qdpu9b5qZ=NzbV04HAmg@mail.gmail.com> <CAC+beqwCyk=zkSbyO_5c1SCdKZD7BFKeOsp_1GcgCJUMGShSBg@mail.gmail.com> <CALYr0GARqw7wpat9VemQ=C-EDF_9yL9PXhpVNsMZqdYb6V5dwg@mail.gmail.com> <791752116.9884.1526561715701.JavaMail.mhammett@ThunderFuck> <CALYr0GCV+Lk0DCF3AoE6FD1+KK_Gk3vsGBxzAC-=wEqgPitKvw@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu 2018-May-17 10:49:37 -0400, Adam Kajtar <akajtar at wadsworthcity.org> wrote:
>Thomas,
>
>Thanks for the info. This is probably why my multipath configuration wasn't
>working as I thought it would. I will give this a test run also.
>
>Mike,
>
>Interesting thought. This would mean rpf-check wouldn't work on my outside
>interfaces. Good to know.
Not necessarily that it doesn't work at all, but there are
platform-specific differences in terms of loose vs. strict, whether the
default route is considered in RPF evaluation, etc. From
https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos/topics/task/configuration/interfaces-configuring-unicast-rpf.html#jd0e50
> # Unicast RPF Behavior with a Default Route
>
> On all routers except those with MPCs and the MX80 router, unicast RPF
> behaves as follows if you configure a default route that uses an interface
> configured with unicast RPF:
>
> * Loose modeâ??All packets are automatically accepted. For this reason, we
> recommend that you not configure unicast RPF loose mode on interfaces *
> that the default route uses.
> * Strict modeâ??The packet is accepted when the source address of the
> packet matches any of the routes (either default or learned) that can be
> reachable through the interface. Note that routes can have multiple
> destinations associated with them; therefore, if one of the destinations
> atches the incoming interface of the packet, the packet is accepted.
>
> On all routers with MPCs and the MX80 router, unicast RPF behaves as
> follows if you configure a default route that uses an interface configured
> with unicast RPF:
>
> * Loose modeâ??All packets except the packets whose source is learned from
> the default route are accepted. All packets whose source is learned from
> the default route are dropped at the Packet Forwarding Engine. The
> default route is treated as if the route does not exist.
> * Strict modeâ??The packet is accepted when the source address of the
> packet matches any of the routes (either default or learned) that can be
> reachable through the interface. Note that routes can have multiple
> destinations associated with them; therefore, if one of the destinations
> matches the incoming interface of the packet, the packet is accepted.
>
> On all routers, the packet is not accepted when either of the following is
> true:
>
> * The source address of the packet does not match a prefix in the routing
> table.
> * The interface does not expect to receive a packet with this source
> address prefix.
--
Hugo Slabbert | email, xmpp/jabber: hugo at slabnet.com
pgp key: B178313E | also on Signal
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20180517/a34cd76e/attachment.sig>