[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Best practices on logical separation of abuse@ vs dmca@ role inboxes

Subject: Best practices on logical separation of abuse@ vs dmca@ role inboxes
From: mh at xalto.net (Michael Hallgren)
Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2018 22:45:13 +0200
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <CAB69EHgcEskYwZOgTgefrc85ZX9ik2NzM53q95BqEHrAen7qgA@mail.gmail.com> <em0d4f8349-621d-4edf-90ea-c8ab95df44d1@desktop-k5pu39b> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

Le 2018-08-06 16:03, JÃ©rÃ´me Nicolle a Ã©critÂ :
> Hi Jack,
> 
> Le 05/08/2018 Ã  21:51, nanog at jack.fr.eu.org a Ã©critÂ :
>> By "appropriate place", you mean "the trash bin" ?
> 
> Nope, that would eat-up storage and IOs. The proper destination is
> /dev/null, unless they provide you with the required informations to
> send a bill.

Straight to unless, right ;-)

mh

> 
> Best regards,

References:
- Best practices on logical separation of abuse@ vs dmca@ role inboxes
  - From: eric.kuhnke at gmail.com (Eric Kuhnke)
- Best practices on logical separation of abuse@ vs dmca@ role inboxes
  - From: dcorbe at hammerfiber.com (Daniel Corbe)
- Best practices on logical separation of abuse@ vs dmca@ role inboxes
  - From: nanog at jack.fr.eu.org (nanog at jack.fr.eu.org)
- Best practices on logical separation of abuse@ vs dmca@ role inboxes
  - From: jerome at ceriz.fr (Jérôme Nicolle)

Prev by Date: Best practices on logical separation of abuse@ vs dmca@ role inboxes
Next by Date: Best practices on logical separation of abuse@ vs dmca@ role inboxes
Previous by thread: Best practices on logical separation of abuse@ vs dmca@ role inboxes
Next by thread: Best practices on logical separation of abuse@ vs dmca@ role inboxes
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread