[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Best practices on logical separation of abuse@ vs dmca@ role inboxes
- Subject: Best practices on logical separation of abuse@ vs dmca@ role inboxes
- From: valdis.kletnieks at vt.edu (valdis.kletnieks at vt.edu)
- Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2018 11:09:18 -0400
- In-reply-to: <CAHdm834t7i_bw7rSDLUDsm9W91oVTLPrkxwS53WJb+Fn_WgT=g@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAB69EHgcEskYwZOgTgefrc85ZX9ik2NzM53q95BqEHrAen7qgA@mail.gmail.com> <em0d4f8349-621d-4edf-90ea-c8ab95df44d1@desktop-k5pu39b> <[email protected]> <CAHdm834t7i_bw7rSDLUDsm9W91oVTLPrkxwS53WJb+Fn_WgT=g@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, 06 Aug 2018 09:51:17 -0500, Matt Harris said:
> But then the question becomes "how are they supposed to find the 'proper
> address' for their reports?"
Asked and answered already.
On 8/5/2018 16:53:35, "John Levine" <johnl at iecc.com> wrote:
>See https://www.copyright.gov/dmca-directory/
If you are in fact registered there, it becomes *their* problem to send
their reports to the address you registered.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 482 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20180806/f5bfee20/attachment.sig>