[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
AS36040 Prefix Limits
- Subject: AS36040 Prefix Limits
- From: nanog at ics-il.net (Mike Hammett)
- Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 08:17:33 -0500 (CDT)
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <204096213.4175.1508347501222.JavaMail.mhammett@ThunderFuck> <495568468.4193.1508347798972.JavaMail.mhammett@ThunderFuck> <[email protected]>
It is in conjunction with a route server. The filtering I meant would be that network A wants the IX to drop all advertisements to them from network B. Normally solved by network B putting a community on their routes to not advertise to network A, but network B doesn't want to do one-off configs.
-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
Midwest-IX
http://www.midwest-ix.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Andy Davidson" <andy at nosignal.org>
To: "Mike Hammett" <nanog at ics-il.net>
Cc: "NANOG list" <nanog at nanog.org>
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2017 1:20:08 AM
Subject: Re: AS36040 Prefix Limits
Hi, Mike
On 18/10/2017, 18:39, Mike Hammett <nanog at ics-il.net> wrote:
> I am looking for someone that can speak authoritatively regarding AS36040's
> ability to change their own prefix limits, prefix filtering, etc.
> My current contact is advising the IX to do the filtering for them, which
> is not something IXes should be doing.
Unless this is in conjunction with a multilateral peering session (â??route-serverâ??), when prefix-filtering is something that the IXP very much should be doing.
Andy